Obama: Fewer speeches or fewer air strikes?

That Drudge, what a card!

You have to admit that the meaning is (deliberately) ambiguous.

The link, though, reveals:

Obama reframes counterterrorism policy with new rules on dronesBy Tom Curry, National Affairs Writer, NBC News 

In a major address Thursday President Barack Obama sought to reframe his counterterrorism strategy saying that “America is at a crossroads.”

So remember, "When you come to a fork in the road, take it!"

Time mag zeroes like a laser!

Time magazine really knows how to zero in on the really important questions:

Time's piece is here.

The Left is so utterly predictable

It's so easy to be correct when predicting what the Left will do or say. Earlier this week I left a comment at American Digest on the topic of the slaughter of the young British soldier on a London street, done by two Muslims who openly boasted to a passerby's running smartphone video that "you will never be safe" from future attacks. The post with video is here.

In my comment there, I wrote,

The attackers' motives are unclear. They are clearly disillusioned youth who are the victims of a racist British social structure. They have been marginalized from decent jobs. While none of us can condone or excuse this terrible killing, we must not fall into Islamophobic, simplistic explanations that merely serve to further oppress the people who are also at-risk immigrant community members. 

... Just thought I'd save you the trouble of reading the Leftwing commentary that will be coming soon.

It did not take long for London's mayor to utter the utterly predictable:

On his Twitter account, London Mayor Boris Johnson called the murder of a British soldier by two Muslims, “a sickening, deluded and unforgivable act of violence.”

Boris Johnson has said the blame for the brutal murder of a soldier in Woolwich lies with the ‘warped mind-set’ of his killers. ‘One obvious point, it is completely wrong to blame this killing on Islam.’

So Boris, why don't you drop by and ask the killers whether they think they acted in the name of Islam?

This is just nuts

I gotta get me one of these!



Full screen is best

How to give to Tornado Relief

The United Methodist Committee on Relief (UMCOR) is one of the only relief organizations that guarantees that 100 percent of your donation goes directly and exclusively to relief, none to expenses or overhead.

The link directly to the tornado response donation page is here.

BBC News - Climate slowdown!

BBC News - Climate slowdown means extreme rates of warming 'not as likely':

Since 1998, there has been an unexplained "standstill" in the heating of the Earth's atmosphere. Writing in Nature Geoscience, the researchers say this will reduce predicted warming in the coming decades. 

But long-term, the expected temperature rises will not alter significantly.

Of course not! Because climate scientists have faith!

And I love this part: "there has been an unexplained "standstill" in the heating of the Earth's atmosphere."

It's not "unexplained." The scientists were wrong, pure and simple. It's like me predicting that the Braves will defeat the Twins today based on batting averages, RBIs and so forth, then if the Braves lose, I say their loss is "unexplained."

What climate "scientists" are saying is that the climate did not conform to their models. But the models are sound, it's the climate that is wrong. But since, "the expected temperature rises will not alter significantly," the climate will finally see the light and come around to doing what the scientists say it must.

But remember, climate science has no product to sell, it's just one fundraising routine after another.

Birth of a monster - this video is as close as I ever want to be

Birth of the Moore, Okla. F4 twister - stunning, go full screen for full effect:



"Charles Cook captured the six minutes of the 5-20-13 tornado's chilling beginnings from a mall parking lot on his cell phone camera."

Source.

"Told you so"

On the news that Fox News reporter Jay Rosen and others were under FBI investigation for doing nothing except what reporters have been doing for a couple hundred years (asking questions):

Were Oklahoma tornadoes caused by global cooling?

Back in 1975, scientists blamed the previous year's huge tornado outbreak on global cooling.

The entire scanned article is at the link, but here is the key part:

Fortunately, in our more enlightened age, we know that the problem today is neither global cooling nor global warming, but the fact the the climate is not granite stable. Yes, "climate change" is what messes up our world. 

As I posted in 2007, 

I've always kind of suspected that underlying much of environmentalism is a desire for the impossible: stasis. For the earth will either get warmer or cooler, but it definitely won't stay the same. 

A commenter on the FB page where I found the scans, above, said,

It's interesting that "Climate Change" has become for the left just what the "enlightened" use to accuse theists for having - a "God of the gaps" ... no matter the empirical data, it is caused by "climate change".

Which caused me to comment there a link to my 2008 post, "Environmentalist religion explained," in which I picked up and ran with renowned physicist Freeman Dyson's observation:

There is a worldwide secular religion which we may call environmentalism, holding that we are stewards of the earth, that despoiling the planet with waste products of our luxurious living is a sin, and that the path of righteousness is to live as frugally as possible. [From, "The Question of Global Warming."] ...

My pickup theme was this:

The common themes of both scriptural Judaism and Christianity deal with deity, the natural world (existing first in a purity state), a corruption of the purity state (Augustine: "fall from grace,"), redemption and liberation/salvation. Then follows paradise. A prominent, though not universal, strain in both Judaism and Christianity is a looming apocalypse that in potential or in fact destroys enormous swaths of humanity.

Modern environmentalism has all these elements, with an emphasis on apocalypticism. I'll examine these religious elements in turn. 

Read the whole thing!

Why do most mutual funds trail the market?

Interesting insights from a retiring Morgan-Stanley investment strategist. In any given year, 60 percent of managed funds underperform their market segment (I have read other sources that say it is 70 percent).

But in fact, raw numberS reveal that half perform higher, half lower - before management fees are deducted.

It's the fees that drag many funds' overall performance below their index.

Long piece, worth the read:

Dick Tracy, call your office

Introducing the iWatch.

Still only experimental at this stage.

George Washington! Say it ain't so!

Will the madness never stop?

Yahoo goes into internet porn business

The big technology-company news today is that Yahoo.com announced it will buy Tumblr.com for $1.1 billion. 

Apparently this is getting a lot of attention because:

1. Tumblr is a blog platform, which means that Yahoo is now (potentially) able to go head to head against Google, which own Blogspot (the platform for this blog),

2. "Tumblr gets a bunch of traffic from porn and copyright-violating content. And that doesn't jibe well with any sensible advertiser" (from http://www.businessinsider.com/tumblr-porn-problem-2013-5).



I have a Tumblr blog that I used mainly to park links to read later, but I haven't used it in a long time.

I have always wondered

Someone posted this well-known photo on FB, obviously to make a point (a good point, too), but I have always wondered two things:

1. How did they build the lighthouse to begin with?

2. Did the keeper get swept away as the enormous wave washed around?

Update: Thanks to Gerard Vanderleun for the history here (via email):

The lighthouse became well known in 1989, through a series of photographs taken by Jean Guichard during a storm and while the lighthouse keepers were stranded. The lighthouse keepers had been waiting for a rescue helicopter; upon hearing the sound of Guichard's own helicopter, one of them came out to investigate. As the enormous wave broke over the lighthouse, he was able to hastily retreat back inside (source).

He also provided the link to the YouTube video:

And Reader Hal. D, emails, "I found this link which briefly talks about both the lighthouse and the famous photograph. http://celticcountries.com/magazine/culture/la-jument-brittany-most-famous-lighthouse/. No actual construction details though."

Thanks, Hal!

And this video's description says the lighthouse took 14 years to build and was automated in 1990.

Bob Schieffer puts self at audit risk

Veteran CBS newsman Bob Schieffer just hammered White House senior advisor Dan Pfeiffer on Face the Nation this morning when Pfeiffer,

... gave stock answers to questions about the three crises facing the President leading Schieffer to first accuse his guest of taking "exactly the approach that the Nixon administration took" and finally scolding him by asking, "Why are you here today? Why isn't the White House Chief of Staff here to tell us what happened?" (transcript and commentary):

As one commenter at Newsbusters said, the IRS may now be calling Mr. Schieffer.

Umbrellagate caption contest!

Leave your caption as a comment! (Caption rules still apply.)

If it was Obama, it might be worth more

1975 Presidential Umbrella Lt Col Robert Blake President Ford Press Photo | eBay:

Why was there no Umbrellagate then?

Remember when dissent was patriotic? Me, neither.

Welcome to NJ, Pro Gun Citizen Forcefully Removed From Hearing in the Middle of His Testimony:

Umbrella-Gate? Get a grip!

I posted about this on Thursday, but I never thought that "Umbrellagate" would become the meme that it has. (Update: The Umbrellagate Caption Contest!)

Talk about much ado about nothing, the Weekly Standard provides the latest example. During today's Rose Garden news conference with Turkey's prime minister, President Obama told  US Marine Corps NCOs on the White House staff to hold umbrellas over his and the PM's head when rain fell.

The laugh of the day goes to the Daily Caller:

Not even the President of the United States can request a Marine to carry an umbrella without the express consent of the Commandant of the Marine Corps, according to the Marine Corps Manual.

This is truly stupid, sorry. The president in the commander in chief of the armed forces. His orders ALWAYS supersede a mere regulation. Heck, the Commandant of the Marine Corps can order any Marine to carry an umbrella – a pink one if he wants, since the Commandant’s authority overwhelms a mere regulation. I mean, what part of "commander in chief" do they not understand?

The basic fact that must be considered here is that this was a state event and there are exacting protocols established by literally centuries of tradition. Prime Minister Erdogan was a peer visitor, head of state hosted by head of state.

So, those of you getting vapors over this, pick one of the following:

a. Obama just forgets about an umbrella and stands in the rain. Of course, the visiting head of state standing next to him also gets soaked. Yeah, that’s smart diplomacy!

b. Obama asks for an umbrella which he holds himself. A Marine hands one to the PM, too. More smart diplomacy! Help yourself, PM. I guarantee this would have ripped to shreds by domestic and Turkish media, and rightfully so.

c. Obama orders a Marine to hold an umbrella over the PM’s head but he does not use one himself. And that puts the PM on the spot – he will either have to refuse the umbrella or accept it and be shamed before his countrymen in Turkey’s media reporting.

d. Obama has a Marine hold an umbrella over the PM’s head but he holds his own umbrella. Not as bad a gaffe as (c) but still a gaffe.

ANY commentary on this event that fails to take into account that this event was alongside a visiting head of state is simply uninformed and unserious. In my first career I spent some time working with White House staff and I know there are protocols that are detailed. The PM was an equal-status visitor. When the rain began falling Obama could not treat the PM differently than himself.

(Although maybe the smartest move would have been for Obama to take an umbrella over the to PM's podium and personally hold it over both their heads.)

And Marines are not gods. Jeepers. But your hyperventilating sure does make them look fragile. OMG, a Marine is holding an umbrella! How can he stand it? I guess it’s now to onset of PTSD or something.

The whole non-issue is ridiculous.

And then there is this, sports fans:

Last word needs to be heeded:

And there are conservatives who just can’t understand why democrats and independent voters just don’t buy their narrative about how serious a scandal Benghazi/AP phones/IRS Target/Joe Slestak is. The funny thing is, they have nobody to blame but themselves. 

When every waking moment of Obama’s life is an outrage, nothing is an outrage.

Indeed.

Update: And just to inject a little humor into something that is almost beyond parody, perhaps there is a reason the Marines have to hold the umbrella, since Obama seems never to have mastered the skill:

But on this as so many other issues, Obama is merely continuing Bush's policies:

Another update: And that darn Ronald Reagan treated the military like crap:

Just how long has this been going on? Quite awhile!

The "President Schultz" meme grows

Boston Herald:

Has President Nixon been replaced by Sergeant Schultz? 

The “Smartest President Ever” has disappeared. The Barack Brain Trust long-touted by liberals is gone — replaced by hacks whose rallying cry is straight from Stalag 13—“I know nothing. Nothing!”

You know, like this:

I see nuttink! I hear nuttink! I know nuttink! 
I am only der president!

The BoHerald is right, though, in setting aside the Obama-as-Nixon meme. For all Nixon's faults, he was in charge of his administration. Nixon was a man in command and everybody knew it. Not 
like President IDK:

Mandating insurance coverage

A couple of headlines that seem self-explanatory:

Royal Oak Ordinance Requires $1 Million ‘Dangerous Dog’ Insurance Policy

D.C. Considers Mandatory $250K Insurance Policy for Gun Buyers

There is a difference other than the face amounts here - DC's proposed ordinance considers guns dangerous in themselves; to acquire or already own a gun would require immediate coverage. But the Royal Oak ordinance says,

[A] dog is deemed dangerous if it bites or attacks a person, or causes serious injury to another domestic animal. Exceptions include dogs protecting an owner or a homeowner’s property.

So a dog must be proven dangerous before the mandatory-insurance ordinance kicks in, but an inanimate firearm is automatically dangerous.